{"id":156282,"date":"2023-04-22T00:05:40","date_gmt":"2023-04-22T00:05:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/culture.org\/?p=156282"},"modified":"2023-04-23T00:06:25","modified_gmt":"2023-04-23T00:06:25","slug":"ai-experts-warn-against-development-pause-amid-global-competition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/culture.org\/special-interest\/ai-experts-warn-against-development-pause-amid-global-competition\/","title":{"rendered":"AI Experts Warn Against Development Pause Amid Global Competition"},"content":{"rendered":" \r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n
<\/p>\n
Military tech executives and experts testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee, arguing that a pause on artificial intelligence (AI) development would only benefit China and could lead to Chinese AI standards becoming the global norm.<\/span><\/p>\n The experts’ statements come in response to the recent open letter signed by AI experts, including Elon Musk and Steve Wozniak, urging for a six-month halt on AI development.<\/span><\/p>\n Dr. Jason Matheny, President and CEO of the Rand Corporation, and Shyam Sankar, CTO of Palantir, expressed concerns that a pause on AI development in the US would allow China to set international standards around AI use and development.<\/span><\/p>\n Sankar emphasized the importance of a “Democratic AI” and warned that the imposition of China’s recent regulatory guidelines, which prohibit AI models from criticizing the government, would be problematic if adopted worldwide.<\/span><\/p>\n While the experts acknowledged the need for smart regulations guiding AI development, they cautioned that a full pause could harm the Department of Defense (DoD) and its ability to stay ahead of AI innovations.<\/span><\/p>\n Sankar criticized the military’s cautious approach to adopting new technology, comparing it to the rapid procurement of software by Ukraine’s military in response to Russian aggression.<\/span><\/p>\n Dr. Jason Matheny, President and CEO of the Rand Corporation, and Shyam Sankar, CTO of Palantir, expressed concerns that a pause on AI development in the US would allow China to set international standards around AI use and development.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/span>\r\n\r\n Sankar urged the DoD to spend at least 5% of its $768 billion budget on advanced technological solutions, such as those provided by Palantir, to deter adversaries.<\/span><\/p>\n Shift5 Co-founder and CEO, Dr. Josh Lospinoso, highlighted the potential for AI in bolstering the US military’s cybersecurity defenses and called for greater investment in making America’s weapons systems AI-ready.<\/span><\/p>\n Matheny criticized open source AI companies, suggesting that their pursuit of free-flowing information could inadvertently assist military AI systems in other countries.<\/span><\/p>\n He advocated for restrictions on AI tools being sold to foreign governments and additional guardrails before their release to the public.<\/span><\/p>\n The experts also discussed the possibility of offensive actions to limit foreign military AI development, such as trade restrictions, sanctions on high-tech equipment, or even “data poisoning” by manipulating or corrupting datasets used to train military AI models.<\/span><\/p>\n Senators and experts agreed that setting up regulations on AI would be more beneficial than requiring a halt in research.<\/span><\/p>\n Dr. Matheny suggested clamping down on open AI models, requiring licensing for new models, and imposing strict restrictions on AI technology exports to maintain control over AI development.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":156286,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[411],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-156282","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-special-interest"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156282"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=156282"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156282\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/156286"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=156282"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=156282"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/culture.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=156282"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}The Risks of Ceding AI Leadership to China<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Striking a Balance Between Regulation and Development<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
Calls for Increased Investment in AI Capabilities<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Concerns Over Open Source AI and Data Protection<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Crafting Regulations to Govern AI Development<\/strong><\/h2>\n